Article ID Journal Published Year Pages File Type
3168471 Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology, and Endodontology 2009 8 Pages PDF
Abstract

ObjectiveThe magnification and distortion of images made from scanning and nonscanning CCD cephalometric systems was evaluated.Study designAcrylic box and dry human skull phantoms were imaged using a conventional cephalostat, the nonscanning Kodak 8000C, the horizontally scanning GE/Instrumentarium OC100D, and the vertically scanning Sirona OrthophosDS. True linear and angular measurements of the phantoms were made using a coordinate measuring system and the Hitachi MercuRay cone beam system. The accuracy of linear and angular measurements was assessed, as were magnification and distortion, where appropriate.ResultsStatistically significant differences between linear and angular measurements were found for almost all measurements for both phantoms. In general, the conventional cephalostat and Sirona OrthophosDS systems produced the greatest magnification and distortion while the GE/Instrumentarium OC 100D and Kodak 8000C systems, the least.ConclusionsMeasurement differences related to the beam geometries of these systems could not be predicted a priori. Unaccounted for, these differences could result in clinically significant consequences.

Related Topics
Health Sciences Medicine and Dentistry Dentistry, Oral Surgery and Medicine
Authors
, , , ,