| Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3189866 | Annales de Dermatologie et de Vénéréologie | 2007 | 6 Pages |
Abstract
Sensitivity and specificity were better for PS100B than for MIA regarding detection of metastasis during follow-up of thick melanomas. The ELISA technique used in our study seemed to increase the specificity of the assay but not its sensitivity compared to other techniques used previously. We may thus confirm the benefits of PS100B assay for early detection of metastasis in melanomas. However, this laboratory surveillance method is not an acceptable substitute for regular clinical follow-up due to its low sensitivity.
Related Topics
Health Sciences
Medicine and Dentistry
Dermatology
Authors
M. Loppin, V. Quillien, H. Adamski, I. Ollivier, R. Garlantézec, J. Chevrant-Breton,