Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
---|---|---|---|---|
3190205 | Annales de Dermatologie et de Vénéréologie | 2006 | 4 Pages |
Abstract
The existence of a systematic skin rash comprising typical target lesions and mucosal lesions in the oral and genital areas suggested to us a diagnosis of erythema multiforme majus. Screening for the agents generally responsible was negative and drug-induced rash was ruled out. Serological tests for Chlamydia pneumoniae were positive at various times, resulting in diagnosis of erythema multiforme majus secondary to infection with Chlamydia pneumoniae. Following demonstration of the presence of Chlamydia pneumoniae using reliable methods and the elimination of other causes of erythema multiforme majus, dermatologists should opt for this aetiology in order to optimise treatment.
Related Topics
Health Sciences
Medicine and Dentistry
Dermatology
Authors
D. Saada, S. Velasco, P. Vabres, G. Guillet,