Article ID Journal Published Year Pages File Type
3205315 Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology 2013 8 Pages PDF
Abstract

BackgroundSkin biopsies are commonly performed to confirm drug-induced exanthem (DIE). However, the relevance of histologic examination in discriminating between DIE and non-DIE (NDIE) is controversial.ObjectiveA retrospective analysis was performed to evaluate the reliability of histologic diagnosis of DIE.MethodsIn all, 91 patients with a skin biopsy specimen of an acute exanthem temporally related to a single identifiable drug underwent complete allergy testing. Their biopsy specimens were retrospectively re-evaluated by 2 dermatopathologists blinded to the original reports to test for discrimination between DIE versus NDIE.ResultsIn 35 patients, non-IgE-mediated drug allergy was confirmed by allergy testing, whereas in 56 patients drug hypersensitivity could be excluded. Sensitivity of pathology reports for diagnosis of DIE reached 62.9% with a positive predictive value of 40.7%. Specificity was 41.1% with a negative predictive value of 69.7%. No significant difference in tissue eosinophilia was detected between DIE and NDIE.LimitationsThis was a retrospective study.ConclusionsDermatopathologic evaluation of skin biopsy specimens is of limited use in differentiating between DIE and NDIE. All efforts should be made to subject these patients to thorough allergy testing for definitely confirming or ruling out drug hypersensitivity.

Related Topics
Health Sciences Medicine and Dentistry Dermatology
Authors
, , , ,