Article ID Journal Published Year Pages File Type
3205319 Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology 2013 6 Pages PDF
Abstract

BackgroundDirect immunofluorescence (DIF), indirect immunofluorescence (IIF), and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) are used for the laboratory diagnosis of bullous pemphigoid (BP).ObjectiveThe diagnostic value of DIF and IIF on rabbit and monkey esophagus or human salt-split skin and commercial ELISAs was assessed.MethodsThis was a single-center retrospective study where 313 patients with BP were compared with 488 control subjects.ResultsDIF was the most sensitive test (90.8%) whereas sensitivities for IIF on rabbit esophagus, IIF on monkey esophagus, IIF on salt-split skin, BP180 ELISA, and BP230 ELISA were 76.0%, 73.2%, 73.3%, 72.0%, and 59.0%, respectively. The sensitivity of the serologic tests was 88.8% altogether. The specificities for DIF, IIF on rabbit esophagus, IIF on monkey esophagus, IIF on salt-split skin, BP180 ELISA, and BP230 ELISA were 98%, 96.5%, 97.1%, 100%, 94.1%, and 99.2%, respectively.LimitationsThe retrospective nature of study was a limitation. Correlation of diagnostic data with clinical manifestations or disease course was not possible.ConclusionsIn suspected BP, both serologic tests and DIF have to be performed because of a sensitivity issue. Although the ELISAs had a relatively low sensitivity, the serologic tests altogether almost reached the level of sensitivity of DIF. The specificities of all assays were excellent.

Related Topics
Health Sciences Medicine and Dentistry Dermatology
Authors
, , , , ,