Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
---|---|---|---|---|
3206080 | Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology | 2012 | 16 Pages |
Abstract
Since its description in the 1970s, the dysplastic nevus has been a source of confusion, and whether it represents a precursor to melanoma remains a controversial subject. Although a Consensus Conference in 1992 recommended that the term “dysplastic nevus” no longer be used, the histologic diagnosis continues to present a therapeutic quandary for dermatologists and other physicians, and there remains significant variation in clinical management. In part I of this continuing medical education review, we will discuss the historical origins of the term, the evidence for its distinct histologic basis, and its clinical significance.
Keywords
Related Topics
Health Sciences
Medicine and Dentistry
Dermatology
Authors
Keith Duffy, Douglas Grossman,