Article ID Journal Published Year Pages File Type
3214584 Journal of Dermatological Science 2006 12 Pages PDF
Abstract

SummaryBackgroundThe recovery of RNA from the upper epidermis by tape stripping yields variable RNA mass but has not been evaluated for its dependence on anatomical location. Gene expression at different body locations and the origin of RNA recovered by tape stripping have not been investigated.ObjectivesTo characterize the recovery of RNA from different anatomical locations by tape stripping; to correlate the recovery of RNA and removal of barrier by tape stripping, as assayed by transepidermal water loss; and to investigate gene expression in the upper epidermis at different body locations.MethodsTwelve subjects were tape stripped at 15 body locations. RNA mass was evaluated and gene expression assayed. Subjects were tape stripped 4, 8 and 12 times on the upper back and transepidermal water loss and RNA recovery assayed.ResultsRanked by median RNA recovery, the following order was observed: mastoid > forehead > chest > upper back > mid back > cheek > lower back > deltoid > forearm > abdomen > ventral thigh > inner arm > shin > dorsal thigh > lower leg. Expression of the housekeeping gene mRNAs is found to be uniform and reproducible while IL-8 and TNFα mRNAs are expressed in different quantities both at different body sites within an individual and between individuals at a specific anatomical site. Data show a significant and high correlation between the number of tapes used to strip a site and transepidermal water loss but no strong correlation between transepidermal water loss and RNA recovery or number of tapes used to strip a site and RNA recovery.ConclusionsSubjects and anatomical location are shown to be significantly different for the ability to recover RNA by tape stripping. We hypothesize that RNA recovered by tape strip is not derived from corneocytes but from cells associated with the stratum corneum.

Related Topics
Health Sciences Medicine and Dentistry Dermatology
Authors
, , , ,