| Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3261818 | Digestive and Liver Disease | 2014 | 5 Pages |
BackgroundInformation concerning management of anal canal cancer among the elderly is scarce and much less abundant than for younger subjects.Population and methodsWe retrospectively analysed 115 patients treated for anal epidermoid cancer between 2000 and 2010. The population was divided according to age (<70 years and ≥70 years).ResultsOf the 115 patients, 81 (70.4%) were <70 years old and 34 were ≥70 years (29.6%). Tumour characteristics were identical between the two groups and median follow-up was 62 months. Elderly patients had a less favourable performance status (p = 0.001) and fewer had received radiochemotherapy (61.8% vs 82.5%, p = 0.004). Treatment-related grade 3 and 4 hematologic toxicity was observed more often among elderly subjects. The results at 5 years were less favourable for overall, disease-specific, and disease-free survival (respectively p = 0.002, p = 0.001, and p = 0.001). For patients treated with a curative intent, at 5 years there was no difference between the two groups in terms of overall survival (p = 0.2). However, there was a statistically significant difference in favour of the younger group for disease-free survival and metastasis-free survival.ConclusionIf radiochemotherapy can be delivered to elderly subjects with a good general status, the effects appear less favourable than in younger patients.
