Article ID Journal Published Year Pages File Type
3271137 Journal of Clinical Densitometry 2012 5 Pages PDF
Abstract
BMD at the L1-L4 spine, total proximal femur, and femoral neck was very highly correlated (r2 ≥ 0.98) between densitometers, as was the one-third radius site (r2 = 0.96). Bland-Altman analyses demonstrated no clinically significant bias at all evaluated sites. BMD precision was similar between instruments at the L1-L4 spine, mean total proximal femur, and femoral neck. Finally, one-third radius BMD measurements in the supine vs seated position on the iDXA were highly correlated (r2 = 0.96). In conclusion, there is excellent BMD correlation between iDXA and Prodigy densitometers. Similarly, BMD precision is comparable with these two instruments.
Related Topics
Health Sciences Medicine and Dentistry Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism
Authors
, , , , ,