Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
---|---|---|---|---|
3273121 | Journal de Gynécologie Obstétrique et Biologie de la Reproduction | 2010 | 4 Pages |
Abstract
Patient follow-up after treatment for a breast cancer is based on the local recurrence risk. Annual mammography remains the main point of this follow-up and tumor markers detection has still no interest. Absence of benefit of an intensive clinical, biological and radiological surveillance has been proved for a long time but expert recommendations still are a subject of discussion although they knew no evolution for more than 10Â years. Evolution of those follow-up modalities will depend on the future indications of MRI and PET. About distant recurrence, a better knowledge of the risk is now possible thanks to the tumor biological profile study. Nevertheless, intensification of follow-up for some kind of high-risk tumors will have interest only if we can propose a therapeutic alternative in metastatic situation.
Related Topics
Health Sciences
Medicine and Dentistry
Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism
Authors
J.-M. Classe, L. Sentilhes, I. Jaffré, M. Mezzadri, C. Lefebvre-Lacoeuille, M. Dejode, L. Catala, V. Bordes, F. Dravet, P. Descamps,