Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
---|---|---|---|---|
3280795 | Arab Journal of Gastroenterology | 2013 | 6 Pages |
Background and study aimsThere is controversy regarding whether a specific hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotype is associated with diabetes mellitus. This study aimed to investigate HCV genotype distribution in diabetics and its relation to some clinical and laboratory variables in HCV-positive diabetic versus non-diabetic Egyptians in East Delta.Patients and methodsThe study included 100 HCV-positive patients of which 66 were diabetic in addition to 35 healthy adults as a control group. Clinical assessment, laboratory measurements of plasma glucose, insulin, C-peptide, C-reactive protein (CRP), tumour necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) and liver functions (alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST) and gamma-glutamyltransferase (GGT)) as well as HCV genotype determination were done, and AST/platelet ratio index (APRI) and Homoeostasis Model of Assessment-Insulin Resistance (HOMA-IR) were calculated.ResultsThe main results were the presence of HCV genotype 3, in 31.8% of the diabetic group and in 26.5% of the non-diabetic group, while the remainder of cases had genotype 4, the predominant genotype in Egypt. This is the first report of the presence of HCV genotype 3 in about 30% of an Egyptian cohort. However, there was no significant difference in genotype distribution between both groups. Further, there were significantly higher values of HOMA-IR, insulin and C-peptide in HCV-positive groups in comparison to the control group, while TNF-α was significantly higher in the HCV-positive diabetic group. However, there were no significant differences between both genotypes regarding these parameters.ConclusionAlthough this study reveals for the first time the presence of HCV genotype 3 in a significant percentage of a group of Egyptian patients, where the majority were diabetic, the association between diabetes and certain HCV genotypes could not be confirmed on the basis of our findings. Hence, taking into consideration the impact of such a finding on the treatment decisions of those patients, further studies are warranted to explore these findings to a greater extent.