Enteroscopic and radiologic diagnoses, treatment, and prognoses of small-bowel tumors

BackgroundSmall-bowel tumors (SBTs) represent a diagnostic challenge.ObjectiveTo evaluate the usefulness of contrast-enhanced CT (CECT), fluoroscopic enteroclysis (FE), videocapsule endoscopy (VCE), and double-balloon endoscopy (DBE) and the outcome after treatment.DesignSingle-center, retrospective study.SettingTertiary-care referral hospital.PatientsBetween June 2003 and May 2011, 159 consecutive patients with SBTs (93 malignant and 66 benign) were enrolled.Main Outcome MeasurementsComparison of diagnostic yields among CECT, FE, VCE, and DBE and the prognosis.ResultsCECT and FE had significantly lower diagnostic yields of SBTs ≤10 mm, but VCE and DBE had high yields of SBTs regardless of size. CECT had a significantly lower diagnostic yield of epithelial tumors compared with subepithelial tumors. When stratified by the site, the diagnostic yield of VCE for SBTs located only in the distal duodenum/the proximal jejunum (73%) was significantly lower than that for SBTs located in other areas (90%). Comparisons among the 4 methods revealed that VCE and DBE had significantly higher diagnostic yields than CECT, and DBE had significantly higher diagnostic yields than VCE, but a combination of CECT and VCE had a diagnostic yield similar to that of DBE. The histologic diagnostic yield of SBTs by DBE was 92%, and 25% of SBTs were enteroscopically treated. Metastatic tumors had the poorest overall survival, followed by adenocarcinomas and malignant lymphomas.LimitationsRetrospective comparative study.ConclusionFor the detection of SBTs, a combination screening method by using VCE and CECT is recommended. DBE is useful for histologic diagnosis and endoscopic treatment.