| Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3308175 | Gastrointestinal Endoscopy | 2007 | 7 Pages |
BackgroundEndoscopic sphincterotomy (EST) to remove bile-duct stones is the most frequently used endoscopic technique. Few reports exist regarding application of large-balloon dilation (LBD) after EST for treatment of patients with bile-duct stones.ObjectiveTo compare the effect of EST plus LBD with that of EST alone.DesignA prospective randomized controlled trial.SettingA large tertiary-referral center.Patients and InterventionsTwo hundred consecutive patients with bile-duct stones were randomized in equal numbers to EST plus LBD (12- to 20-mm balloon diameter) or EST alone.Main Outcome MeasurementsSuccessful stone removal and complications such as pancreatitis and bleeding.ResultsEST plus LBD compared with EST alone resulted in similar outcomes in terms of overall successful stone removal (97.0% vs 98.0%), large size (>15 mm) stone removal (94.4% vs 96.7%), and the use of mechanical lithotripsy (8.0% vs 9.0%). Complications were similar between the 2 groups (5.0% vs 7.0%, P = .767). Complications were as follows for the EST plus LBD group and the EST group: pancreatitis, 4.0% and 4.0%; cholecystitis, 1.0% and 1.0%; and bleeding (delayed), 0% and 2.0%, respectively.ConclusionsBased on the similar rates of successful stone removal and complications, EST plus LBD should be an effective alternative to EST. EST plus LBD is a safe and effective treatment for endoscopic removal of common bile duct stones.
