| Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type | 
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3317382 | Pancreatology | 2011 | 8 Pages | 
Abstract
												Background/Aims: The lack of a system to classify invasive procedures to treat local complications of acute pancreatitis is an obstacle to comparing interventions. This study aimed to develop and validate a comprehensive multidisciplinary classification. Methods: Standardized terminology was used to develop a classification of procedures based on three key components: how the lesion is visualized, the route used during the procedure, and the procedure's purpose. Gastroenterologists, radiologists, and surgeons (n = 22) from three New Zealand centers independently classified 15 published technique descriptions. Inter-rater reliability was calculated for each component. The classification's clarity, ease of use, and potential to achieve its objectives were rated on a Likert scale. Results: The classification's clarity, ease of use, and potential to achieve its objectives had median scores of 4/5. Inter-rater reliability for visualization, route, and purpose components was substantial at 0.73 (95% CI 0.63-0.82), 0.79 (95% CI 0.70-0.87), and 0.64 (95% CI 0.53-0.74), respectively. Conclusions: This article describes the development and validation of a comprehensive classification for the wide range of procedures used to treat the local complications of acute pancreatitis. It has substantial inter-rater reliability and high acceptability, which should enhance communication between clinicians and facilitate comparison between procedures.
											Keywords
												
											Related Topics
												
													Health Sciences
													Medicine and Dentistry
													Gastroenterology
												
											Authors
												Benjamin P.T. Loveday, Maxim S. Petrov, Saxon Connor, Jeremy I. Rossaak, Anubhav Mittal, Anthony R.J. Phillips, John A. Windsor, 
											