Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
---|---|---|---|---|
3318287 | Pancreatology | 2008 | 5 Pages |
Abstract
Background/Aims: Morphine has been contraindicated for pain treatment in acute pancreatitis because of its presumed opioid-induced sphincter of Oddi dysfunction. However, scientific evidence supporting a deleterious influence on the clinical course is absent. This pilot study was undertaken to evaluate the efficacy and adverse events of metamizole versus morphine in acute pancreatitis. Methods: 16 patients with acute pancreatitis were randomized to receive 10 mg/ 4 h s.c. (n = 8) morphine or 2 g/8 h i.v. (n = 8) metamizole. Pain scores were recorded every 4 h during 48 h after admission by a Visual Analogue Scale. Pethidine was additionally administered as a rescue therapy. Results: 75% of patients achieved pain relief in the metamizole group versus 37.5% in the morphine group within 24 h of hospitalization (6/8 vs. 3/8; p: n.s.).The mean time to achieve pain relief was shorter in the metamizole group (10 ± 6.6 vs. 17 ± 18.3 h; p: n.s.). At the end of the study, 75% of patients achieved pain relief in the metamizole group versus 50% in the morphine group. Three patients in each group needed pethidine: 2 out of 3 achieved pain control in the metamizole group vs. 0 out of 3 in the morphine group. Conclusions: Intravenous metamizole shows a non-significant association with a quicker pain relief than morphine s.c. in acute pancreatitis. A larger randomized controlled trial should be desirable to confirm this result.
Keywords
Related Topics
Health Sciences
Medicine and Dentistry
Gastroenterology
Authors
A.M. Peiró, J. MartÃnez, E. Martinez, E. de Madaria, P. Llorens, J.F. Horga, M. Pérez-Mateo,