Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
---|---|---|---|---|
3348444 | Diagnostic Microbiology and Infectious Disease | 2007 | 4 Pages |
Abstract
To evaluate the Binax NOW Influenza A & B combination assay, we tested upper respiratory tract samples in parallel with the Binax NOW Flu A and Binax NOW Flu B assays, the Becton-Dickinson Directigen Flu A+B assay, and immunofluorescence, and the results were compared with viral culture. Of the 521 samples tested, influenza A was cultured from 113 and influenza B from 6. There were no significant differences in the performance of all rapid antigen tests, with sensitivities of 53% to 59% for detecting influenza A compared with culture and immunofluorescence (80%). The sensitivities for all rapid tests were significantly higher for nasopharyngeal samples than for throat swabs. The Binax NOW Influenza A & B assay performed as well as other rapid assays. Commercial antigen detection assays are useful tools for the rapid diagnosis of influenza; however, confirmatory testing is always recommended. The use of nasopharyngeal samples for all rapid detection methods should be strongly encouraged.
Related Topics
Life Sciences
Immunology and Microbiology
Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology
Authors
Marita Smit, Kirsten A. Beynon, David R. Murdoch, Lance C. Jennings,