Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
---|---|---|---|---|
3374851 | Journal of Infection | 2012 | 4 Pages |
SummaryObjectiveTo evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of influenza virus detection by two commercial reverse transcriptase PCR methods compared with a reference real-time PCR.Methods122 clinical specimens were tested on Xpert® Flu and RealStar® Influenza Screen & Type. A reference real-time RT-PCR, at a specialist laboratory was chosen as the gold standard for comparison.ResultsRealStar® Influenza Screen & Type had higher sensitivity for influenza A and influenza B respectively (92.3% and 88.2%) when compared to Xpert® Flu (78.8% and 76.5%). Both tests had excellent specificity.ConclusionsThe simplicity and speed of the Xpert® Flu system could allow it to be used in the near-patient setting; however in circumstances where excluding a diagnosis of influenza may be critical, negative specimens may need to be repeated using a more sensitive assay.