Article ID Journal Published Year Pages File Type
3376504 Journal of Infection 2007 6 Pages PDF
Abstract

SummaryObjectiveThis study was designed to compare cefepime exposures with microbiological outcomes in ESBL and non-ESBL infections and determine the pharmacodynamic profiles associated with successful outcome.MethodsCefepime pharmacodynamic exposures of unbound drug [time above MIC (fT > MIC), minimal concentration over MIC (fCmin/MIC), and area under the curve over MIC (fAUC/MIC)] for 18 patients with ESBL and non-ESBL infections were determined by using a published population pharmacokinetic model. Classification and regression tree analysis was used to identify pharmacodynamic breakpoints that predicted eradication. A 5000-patient Monte Carlo Simulation was conducted to estimate the probability of target attainment for the goal pharmacodynamic exposures.ResultsEradication was 80% when fT > MIC was 50% compared with 0% when T > MIC was less than 50% (p < 0.05). The median fCmin/MIC ratio for ESBL group was statistically lower than that for the non-ESBL group (1.54 versus 138, p < 0.001). Regardless of ESBL production, all pathogens were eradicated when fCmin/MIC > 7.6 and only 33.3% were eradicated when fCmin/MIC ≤ 7.6 (p < 0.05). Pharmacodynamic exposures of 50% fT > MIC and fAUC/MIC > 1654 were also predictive of eradication. While conventional dosage regimens of 2 g q 12 h and q 8 h failed to achieve adequate target attainment, 4 g continuous infusion and 2 g q 6–8 h prolonged infusion could attain more than 90% of target attainment at the MIC of 2 μg/ml for the breakpoint of fCmin/MIC = 7.6.ConclusionMicrobiological eradication in patients receiving cefepime was best predicted by fCmin/MIC ratio greater than 7.6 regardless of the presence of an ESBL. Continuous or prolonged infusion regimens provided the greatest probability of attaining this exposure.

Related Topics
Life Sciences Immunology and Microbiology Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology
Authors
, , ,