Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
---|---|---|---|---|
3380901 | Osteoarthritis and Cartilage | 2009 | 6 Pages |
SummaryObjectiveThe Lysholm Knee Scale is an 8-item questionnaire originally designed as an outcome measure for ligament reconstruction but is commonly used as a measure for knee chondral damage. This study tests the scale's internal construct validity using the Rasch model, a measurement model which sets strict standards for the quality of measurement derived from the scale. The study also investigates the level of agreement between scores from patients and physiotherapists; and reviews the present weighting system.DesignOne hundred and fifty-seven patients with knee chondral damage awaiting surgery completed the Lysholm as part of a multicentre clinical trial based in 16 UK and two Norwegian hospitals. The patients were assessed by a physiotherapist who independently completed the Lysholm on the same day.ResultsFit to the Rasch model was achieved [mean item fit −0.26, standard deviation (SD) 1.01] after removal of one item (Swelling). With no differential item functioning (DIF) by rater, the intraclass correlation coefficient was 0.9 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.86–0.93] and a Bland–Altman plot showed no consistent difference in rating.ConclusionsThe Lysholm Knee Scale satisfies Rasch model expectations after removal of the swelling item. Generally there is a high degree of agreement between the patient and professional ratings. By removing the swelling item and using unweighted scores, a modified version of the Lysholm Knee Scale is recommended as an outcome measure for knee chondral damage.