Article ID Journal Published Year Pages File Type
3391133 Seminarios de la Fundación Española de Reumatología 2010 6 Pages PDF
Abstract
Virtually all patients with a pleural effusion should undergo thoracentesis to aid diagnosis and management. Routine pleural fluid (PF) evaluation usually includes differential cell count, protein, lactate dehydrogenase, glucose and adenosine deaminase determinations, cytology and, if infection is a concern, pH as well as bacterial and mycobacterial cultures. Distinguishing transudates from exudates through Light's criteria is a pragmatic first step. If the effusion is an exudate, various PF tests have proven diagnostic utility: adenosine deaminase levels >35 U/L usually indicate tuberculosis in lymphocytic-predominant PFs, or empyema in neutrophilic-predominant PFs; pH<7.2 or glucose <60 mg/dL allow the clinician to identify complicated parapneumonic effusions, and conventional cytology may demonstrate malignant cells in 60% of patients with malignant effusions. A number of optional PF tests may complement the diagnostic approach to a pleural effusion of uncertain etiology. For example, natriuretic peptide assays significantly improve the accuracy of diagnosis of cardiac pleural effusions, whereas PF mesothelin levels greater than 20 nM are highly suggestive of mesothelioma.
Related Topics
Health Sciences Medicine and Dentistry Immunology, Allergology and Rheumatology
Authors
,