| Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3392262 | Transplant Immunology | 2011 | 9 Pages |
BackgroundMonitoring of EBV DNAemia after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is necessary, but not sufficient, to identify patients at risk of EBV-induced post-transplantation lymphoproliferative disorders (PTLD). Combining this with quantifying EBV-specific cellular immunity was shown to be helpful. In this study, we evaluated the value of IFNγ-Elispot assay in monitoring EBV DNAemia after HSCT.MethodsEBV-DNA load in whole blood was monitored at least weekly using real-time PCR in 40 recipients of HSCT. Quantitative and qualitative T-cell recoveries, including EBV-specific T-cell quantification by Elispot assay, were studied 60, 100, 180 and 360 days after HSCT.ResultsAmong the 35 evaluable patients, 14 (35%) presented EBV DNAemia, only 2/14 (14%) needing pre-emptive treatment with rituximab. The greatest risk factor for EBV DNAemia was the presence of anti-thymocyte globulin (ATG) (p = 0.005). EBV-specific cellular immune recovery was monitored by IFNγ-Elispot assay. Using multivariate analysis, four factors were found to significantly influence IFNγ-Elispot results at defined times post-HSCT: EBV DNAemia, young age, global T-cell recovery and severe acute GVHD. In those cases where EBV DNAemia occurred and cleared spontaneously, Elispot results gave more than 1000 spot-forming cells (SFC)/106 PBMC.ConclusionElispot assay may be usefully combined with EBV-DNA load monitoring to determine when a patient should receive pre-emptive treatment, or when the clinician should avoid Rituximab use which severely immunocompromises patients.
