Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
---|---|---|---|---|
3442205 | American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology | 2006 | 4 Pages |
ObjectiveThe objective of this study was to compare obstetrical outcomes associated with coached versus uncoached pushing during the second stage of labor.Study designUpon reaching the second stage, previously consented nulliparous women with uncomplicated labors and without epidural analgesia were randomly assigned to coached (n = 163) versus uncoached (n = 157) pushing. Women allocated to coaching received standardized closed glottis pushing instructions by certified nurse-midwives with proper ventilation encouraged between contractions. These midwives also attended those women assigned to no coaching to ensure that any expulsive efforts were involuntary.ResultsThe second stage of labor was abbreviated by approximately 13 minutes in coached women (P = .01). There were no other clinically significant immediate maternal or neonatal outcomes between the 2 groups.ConclusionAlthough associated with a slightly shorter second stage, coached maternal pushing confers no other advantages and withholding such coaching is not harmful.