Article ID Journal Published Year Pages File Type
3456136 Asian Pacific Journal of Tropical Medicine 2011 4 Pages PDF
Abstract

ObjectiveTo describe the epidemiology of snake bite in the region and attempt to compare proven Russell's viper with hump-nosed viper bites.MethodsAll snake bite admissions to the Toxicology Unit of Teaching Hospital Peradeniya over three year from 2006 were included.ResultsOf the 776 snakebites, 665(86%) were unidentified and non-envenomed. Hump-nosed viper and Russell's viper accounted for 55(7%) and 40(5%) bites respectively, of them, incriminated snakes were found in 36(65%) and 19(48%) cases. The cobra bites-5, krait bites-0. The median ages: Russell's viper bites-41(range 16-66), hump-nosed viper bites-42(range 15-75). The gender incidence, time of bite (>58% daytime) were similar. In hump-nosed viper bite; upper limb involved in 13(36%), happened at home garden in 22(61%), none in paddy fields. In Russell's viper bite; 6(33%) occurred in paddy fields. Dry bites were similar at 5%. In hump-nosed viper bite: local effects 94%, coagulopathy 3%, acute renal failure 3% and one patient died. In Russell's viper bite; local effects 84%, coagulopathy 53%, neurotoxicity 21%. Abdominal pain occurred only in Russell's viper bites 10(53%).ConclusionsOverwhelming numbers of unidentified, non-envenomed snakebites are common in the central hills. Some distinctive differences were observed between Russell's viper and hump-nosed viper bites.

Related Topics
Health Sciences Medicine and Dentistry Medicine and Dentistry (General)