Article ID Journal Published Year Pages File Type
3463302 Contemporary Clinical Trials 2006 10 Pages PDF
Abstract

Use of an exercise intervention for high-risk and vulnerable populations, such as pregnant women at risk for gestational hypertension or preeclampsia, requires special consideration. A comparative trial testing the effects of two types of physical exercises – stretching (a comparator) and walking (a testing intervention) – for sedentary pregnant women at risk for preeclampsia — is presented in this paper. The study was designed to reduce post-randomization bias and dropout rates from both groups, and closely to monitor safety of subjects. The strengths of the study design and methods include use of a run-in phase; use of a stretching exercise as a comparator; multiple ways to measure daily physical activities and the exercise intervention; and tailored support to remove barriers to exercise for subjects.The intervention consists of 40 min of walking at moderate intensity (i.e., 55–69% of maximum heart rate and rating of perceived exhaustion 12–13) five times a week from 18 weeks gestation until birth. The comparator exercise consists of 40 min of stretching exercise without increasing heart rate to more than 10% of resting heart rate, five times a week from 18 weeks gestation until birth. The primary outcome is the incidence of preeclampsia. Secondary outcomes include the physiologic effects of the intervention and birth outcomes.

Related Topics
Health Sciences Medicine and Dentistry Medicine and Dentistry (General)
Authors
,