Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
---|---|---|---|---|
3463381 | Contemporary Clinical Trials | 2007 | 8 Pages |
Abstract
When treatment failures occur during the course of a clinical trial, the treatment regimen following failure may be changed. This change in therapy complicates comparisons among the original treatment arms. As in some clinical trials with dropouts, intent-to-treat analysis can yield a large bias. We examine the use of multiple imputation to replace observations after treatment failure has occurred. As a sensitivity analysis, this approach is compared to existing methods for handling treatment failures - removing treatment failure subjects, removing data after the onset of treatment failure, and imputing the last observation prior to treatment failure for all subsequent observations - in addition to an analysis of all collected data based on randomized treatment assignment. A data set from the Asthma Clinical Research Network is used to demonstrate the methods.
Keywords
Related Topics
Health Sciences
Medicine and Dentistry
Medicine and Dentistry (General)
Authors
Michele L. Shaffer, Vernon M. Chinchilli,