Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
---|---|---|---|---|
3463466 | Contemporary Clinical Trials | 2007 | 5 Pages |
Abstract
The phenomenon of losing statistical significance with increasing follow-up can arise when a proportional hazard model is applied in a clinical trial where the impact of the intervention results in delaying a negative event such as cancer diagnosis, progression or death. Often parametric methods can be employed in such a setting, however, in studies where only a small percentage of subjects have an event, these methods are often inappropriate. We present an alternative method based on a weighted Kaplan-Meier estimator and a permutation test, and demonstrate its utility in the setting of the Nutritional Prevention of Cancer study where increasing follow-up resulted in loss of statistical significance for the ability of selenized yeast to prevent lung cancer.
Related Topics
Health Sciences
Medicine and Dentistry
Medicine and Dentistry (General)
Authors
Paul H. Frankel, Mary E. Reid, James R. Marshall,