Article ID Journal Published Year Pages File Type
3466309 European Journal of Internal Medicine 2015 5 Pages PDF
Abstract

•To reduce LDL should we improve adherence or switch to a more potent statin?•10% Adherence change decreases LDL by 3–7 mg/dL, depending on statin intensity.•Increase in adherence > 80% further changes LDL only for high intensity statins.•Switch to a potent statin may be more feasible than the efforts to increase adherence.

BackgroundAdherence to statin therapy has been shown to be suboptimal. In statin-treated patients with residual elevated low density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels the physician must decide whether to switch to a more potent statin or try and achieve better adherence. We examined the association between adherence and LDL-C within low, moderate and high intensity statin groups in a “real world” setting.MethodsWe assessed annual adherence by the mean MPR (Medication Possession Ratio = number of purchased/prescribed daily doses) in unselected patient group. Statins were stratified (ACC/AHA Guideline) into low, moderate and high intensity groups. The impact of adherence on LDL levels was assessed by LOESS (locally weighted scatter plot smoothing).ResultsOut of 1183 patients 173 (14.6%) were treated with low, 923 (78.0%) with moderate and 87 (7.4%) with high intensity statins. Statin intensity was inversely associated with adherence (MPR 77 ± 21, 73 ± 22 and 69 ± 21% for low, moderate and high intensity respectively, p = 0.018). Non-adjusted LDL levels decreased with higher adherence: a 10% adherence increase resulted in LDL decrease of 3.5, 5.8 and 7.1 mg/dL in low, moderate and high intensity groups. Analysis of the adherence effect on LDL levels adjusted for age, DM and ischemic heart disease showed that MPR above 80% was associated with an additional decrease in LDL levels only in the high intensity group.ConclusionsIncreased adherence to statins beyond an MPR of 80% improves LDL levels only among patients given high intensity therapy. Switching from lower to higher intensity therapy may be more effective than further efforts to increase adherence.

Related Topics
Health Sciences Medicine and Dentistry Medicine and Dentistry (General)
Authors
, , , , , , , ,