Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
---|---|---|---|---|
3473959 | Heart Failure Clinics | 2007 | 11 Pages |
Abstract
Induction therapy has continued to be a subject of controversy in heart transplantation for more than 20 years. It is an example of a therapy that is logical, and ought to be better than “doing without.” However, a careful review of the evidence suggests otherwise. Except for patients where the benefits clearly outweigh the short and long-term risks, the use of induction therapy should be avoided. In immunosuppression, as in life, there is no “free lunch.” Clinicians need to be certain they fully understand what they are ordering when asking for induction therapy to be administered to their patients.
Related Topics
Health Sciences
Medicine and Dentistry
Medicine and Dentistry (General)
Authors
David A. MD, FACC,