| Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 347777 | Computers and Composition | 2012 | 15 Pages |
Online grant applications are commonly seen as a generic form of writing, one that maintains consistency and style from writer to writer. In this article, I challenge that perception, instead presenting a view of the online grant application as a posthuman writing tool whose influence can vary immensely according to the characteristics of the writer. This view is based on interviews conducted with applicants to the National Science Foundation, especially their experiences with NSF's application Web site, FastLane. Working on the assumption that FastLane is a tool designed to aid in composition, my participants’ variety of use connects the posthuman influence of Web sites such as FastLane with current interpretations of rhetorical agency.
► 19 researchers and program officers were interviewed about experiences with NSF ► FastLane, NSF's submission website, was seen as a key factor in their writing ► Posthumanism best explains how FastLane influences NSF applicants’ writing ► Rhetorical agency can be used to understand posthuman authors in online contexts
