Article ID Journal Published Year Pages File Type
360306 Journal of English for Academic Purposes 2012 12 Pages PDF
Abstract

This article presents a qualitative, comparative study of metadiscourse in the academic writing of two groups of undergraduate students working in two different disciplines. The groups of students were: 1) Native speakers of Mandarin studying in China through the medium of English; 2) Native speakers of Mandarin studying in the UK through the medium of English. For each group of students, we examined writing undertaken in two undergraduate disciplinary courses: Literary Criticism and Translation Studies. Our aim was to extend research into English writing by L1 Mandarin speakers, and to identify patterns of difference and similarity both between educational contexts and between disciplines. Results suggest that patterns of metadiscourse use in our corpus are associated with both disciplinary and contextual factors, but that contextual factors may have a stronger effect than disciplinary factors. For our data, local institutional culture seems to have a noticeable influence on student writers' use of metadiscourse.

► Cross contextual, cross disciplinary study. ► Pedagogic implications for Chinese learners of English. ► Institutional context influences metadiscourse use. ► Disciplinary context may have a weaker effect on metadiscourse use. ► Academic literacy practices are influenced by local context.

Related Topics
Social Sciences and Humanities Arts and Humanities Language and Linguistics
Authors
, ,