An exploratory framework for handling the complexity of mathematical problem posing in small groups

The paper introduces an exploratory framework for handling the complexity of students’ mathematical problem posing in small groups. The framework integrates four facets known from past research: task organization, students’ knowledge base, problem-posing heuristics and schemes, and group dynamics and interactions. In addition, it contains a new facet, individual considerations of aptness, which accounts for the posers’ comprehensions of implicit requirements of a problem-posing task and reflects their assumptions about the relative importance of these requirements. The framework is first argued theoretically. The framework at work is illustrated by its application to a situation, in which two groups of high-school students with similar background were given the same problem-posing task, but acted very differently. The novelty and usefulness of the framework is attributed to its three main features: it supports fine-grained analysis of directly observed problem-posing processes, it has a confluence nature, it attempts to account for hidden mechanisms involved in students’ decision making while posing problems.

► A multi-facet framework for analyzing mathematical problem posing is developed. ► The role of normalization in problem posing in small groups is pointed out. ► Individual considerations of aptness influence problem posing in small groups. ► Differences in quality/quantity of the posed problems in two groups are explained.