Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
---|---|---|---|---|
3798696 | Medicina Clínica | 2014 | 6 Pages |
Abstract
Number needed to treat has been recommended as an easy way to transmit results from a trial, especially controlled clinical trials. Most articles estimate it from a 2Â ÃÂ 2 table, as the inverse of the absolute risk reduction. However, some limitations have been pointed out: The interpretation is not as easy as claimed, confidence intervals are frequently not estimated, and the estimation from 2Â ÃÂ 2 tables is inadequate when the main effect measure has been estimated adjusting for confounding factors. In this paper, we revise how to obtain point estimations and confidence intervals of number needed to treat in 4 situations: 2Â Ã2Â tables, logistic regression, Kaplan-Meier method, and Cox regression.
Keywords
Related Topics
Health Sciences
Medicine and Dentistry
Medicine and Dentistry (General)
Authors
Inés Gómez-Acebo, Trinidad Dierssen-Sotos, Javier Llorca,