Article ID Journal Published Year Pages File Type
3813466 Patient Education and Counseling 2016 9 Pages PDF
Abstract

•Research has predominately focused on clinician-driven campaigns with theoretical underpinnings.•Community and lay-health interventions may be overshadowed due to the clinical focus of bowel cancer screening promotion.•Group education was the most commonly used promotional activity, but its outcomes were variable.•Components of promotional campaigns are measured as a whole rather than individually assessed.

ObjectiveThis paper reviewed the relationship between non-clinical, client-oriented promotional campaigns to raise bowel cancer awareness and screening engagement.MethodAn integrative literature review using predefined search terms was conducted to summarise the accumulated knowledge. Data was analysed by coding and categorising, then synthesized through development of themes.ResultsEighteen of 116 studies met inclusion criteria. Promotional campaigns had varying impact on screening uptake for bowel cancer. Mass media was found to moderately increase screening, predominately amongst “worried well”. Small media used in conjunction with other promotional activities, thus its effect on screening behaviours was unclear. One-on-one education was less effective and less feasible than group education in increasing intention to screen. Financial support was ineffective in increasing screening rates when compared to other promotional activities. Screening engagement increased because of special events and celebrity endorsement.ConclusionNon-clinical promotional campaigns did impact uptake of bowel cancer screening engagement. However, little is evident on the effect of single types of promotion and most research is based on clinician-directed campaigns.Practice implicationsCancer awareness and screening promotions should be implemented at community and clinical level to maximize effectiveness. Such an approach will ensure promotional activities are targeting consumers, thus strengthening screening engagement.

Related Topics
Health Sciences Medicine and Dentistry Medicine and Dentistry (General)
Authors
, , ,