Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
---|---|---|---|---|
3814187 | Patient Education and Counseling | 2013 | 7 Pages |
ObjectiveDespite living donor kidney transplantation (LDKT) being the optimal treatment option for patients with end-stage renal disease, we observed a significant inequality in the number of LDKT performed between patients of Dutch versus non-Dutch descent. We conducted a focus group study to explore modifiable hurdles to LDKT.MethodsFocus group discussions and in-depth interviews were conducted among 50 end-stage renal patients. Analyses were conducted according to ‘grounded theory’ using Atlas.ti.ResultsWe found nearly all patients to be in favor of LDKT (96%). However, multiple factors played a role in considering LDKT. Four potentially modifiable hurdles were derived: (1) inadequate patient education, (2) impeding cognitions and emotions, (3) restrictive social influences, and (4) suboptimal communication. With regard to solutions, we found that our patients were open to home-based group education on renal replacement therapy options (88% in favor).ConclusionThe study highlights the need for sensitivity and awareness of the influence of cultural factors on decision-making when discussing living donation with culturally diverse populations.Practice implicationsSince the majority of our patients were open to a tailored group education in their own homes, we see this as an opportunity to address factors that influence equality in access to LDKT.