| Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3814259 | Patient Education and Counseling | 2012 | 7 Pages |
ObjectiveDescribing the processes that preceded the opening of an integrative oncology program (IOP) within the oncology service (OS) of the largest health maintenance organization in northern Israel.MethodsThe groundwork towards initiation of the IOP was based on three key elements (1) Interviews with patients, practitioners and directors were performed in order to explore perspectives regarding complementary medicine integration (CM) within the OS; (2) review of research data on CM efficacy and safety in cancer care; (3) critical comparative analysis of seven models of IOPs in Israel, Europe, and the U.S.ResultsNinety-three interviews included 24 patients, 34 conventional practitioners, 9 medical directors, and 26 CM-trained practitioners. The interviews revealed that there is a need for CM in the OS, aimed towards improving patients’ well-being during chemotherapy and advanced disease. An integrative oncology score (IOS) was formulated based on 6 themes considered promoters of successful integration.ConclusionsIntegration of CM within an oncology service should address patients’ needs and research knowledge and be built upon mandatory practitioners’ communication.Practice implicationsIOP modeling necessitates in-depth study aimed at revealing the OS needs and expectations, adjusting research data to the OS clinical challenges, and tailoring an appropriate model of integrative care.
