Article ID Journal Published Year Pages File Type
3816609 Patient Education and Counseling 2007 8 Pages PDF
Abstract

ObjectiveTo assess added value of a booster dose of a tailored mammography intervention.MethodsParticipants, non-adherent at baseline, were randomly assigned to usual care or one of three tailored interventions. Intervention group members (n = 657) were further randomly assigned to receive/not receive a booster intervention dose. Electronic record mammography data were collected following initial intervention and at 6 and 15 months post-booster.ResultsBooster had no effect among women not screened after first intervention dose (n = 337). Among women screened after initial dose (n = 320), booster predicted re-screening at 6 but not 15 months. A booster × race interaction showed a booster effect at 6 months for African Americans (OR = 4.66, p = .0005) but not Caucasians (OR = 0.74, p = .44).ConclusionsFindings suggest if a first-dose intervention does not facilitate screening, neither will a booster dose. However, among women for whom a first dose is effective, boosters can facilitate timely repeat adherence, especially among African Americans. At 6 months booster recipients were less likely to be off-schedule but, by 15 months, the groups were similar.Practice implicationsBoosters may effect when, but not whether, women continue screening.

Related Topics
Health Sciences Medicine and Dentistry Medicine and Dentistry (General)
Authors
, , , , , , ,