Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
---|---|---|---|---|
3823624 | Progrès en Urologie | 2011 | 7 Pages |
Abstract
The absence of correlation between the two evaluations before surgery confirms the interest of a double evaluation, objective and subjective. The short-term Pad-Test is easy to perform but presents a limited variability of the measure and a lack of precision in leakage detection. Nevertheless, there is a bias of selection in the recruited population who suffered from a minor or moderated urinary incontinence after prostatectomy, according to Stamey standards. The authors propose to prefer 24Â hours Pad-Test which evaluate the leakage on a larger period of time.
Related Topics
Health Sciences
Medicine and Dentistry
Medicine and Dentistry (General)
Authors
J. Drai, R. Caremel, M. Bubenheim, C. Pfister, P. Grise,