| Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3825397 | Progrès en Urologie | 2010 | 7 Pages |
Abstract
The ACT®, indicated in stress urinary incontinence, is attractive because of the benefit-risk ratio. It could represent an alternative treatment when the artificial urinary sphincter is not technically possible, not accepted or when a reversibility is required. The bladder neck retrovision would improve the ACT® surgery by precision and safety.
Related Topics
Health Sciences
Medicine and Dentistry
Medicine and Dentistry (General)
Authors
B. Vayleux, F. Luyckx, S. Thélu, J. Rigaud, O. Bouchot, G. Karam, L. Le Normand,