Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
---|---|---|---|---|
3826640 | Progrès en Urologie | 2014 | 4 Pages |
Abstract
Circumcision dates back to ancient times, nowadays, this ritual is practiced mainly in the context of Jewish and Muslim religions. The purpose of this article is to give urologists elements of reflection on the act according to the ethical principles of autonomy, beneficence, non-maleficence and justice. According to a Kantian vision, priority should be given to the respect and wishes of the individuals. In contrast, for the utilitarian theory, circumcision can be justified by a contribution to the happiness of the majority of community members at the expense of a given few. In the event of a request for ritual circumcision, urologists find themselves in the middle, uncomfortable for some, questioning the ethics of its meaning. The main pitfall for the surgeon remains in respecting the child's autonomy.
Keywords
Related Topics
Health Sciences
Medicine and Dentistry
Medicine and Dentistry (General)
Authors
C. (Responsable du « comité d'éthique et de déontologie » de l'Association française d'urologie), A. (Responsable du « comité d'andrologie et des maladies sexuelles » de l'Association française d'urologie),