Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
---|---|---|---|---|
3836103 | Seminars in Perinatology | 2016 | 6 Pages |
Abstract
Consideration of what a “good parent” would do in controversial perinatal cases has been largely absent from to ethics literature. This article argues when a cesarean section is required to prevent death or serious disability for a fetus, the pregnant woman has an ethical (although not legal) obligation to undergo that procedure even when she has concerns or conflicting commitments. Further, a clinician may be justified in using persuasive counseling when there is grave harm at stake that the patient has a moral obligation to prevent. This conclusion is tested by exploring its implications in several other analogous controversial contexts.
Keywords
Related Topics
Health Sciences
Medicine and Dentistry
Medicine and Dentistry (General)
Authors
Janet Malek,