| Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3861032 | The Journal of Urology | 2015 | 6 Pages |
Abstract
While the number of systematic reviews published in the urological literature has increased substantially, the methodological quality of these studies remains suboptimal. Systematic review authors and editors should make every effort to adhere to well established methodological standards to enhance the impact of their research efforts.
Keywords
Related Topics
Health Sciences
Medicine and Dentistry
Nephrology
Authors
Katherine Corbyons, Julia Han, Molly M. Neuberger, Philipp Dahm,