Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
---|---|---|---|---|
3866472 | The Journal of Urology | 2010 | 5 Pages |
Abstract
Randomized controlled trials published in the urological literature contain significant deficiencies in adverse event reporting. These findings suggest the need for reporting standards for harm in urological journals. Improvements in adverse event reporting would permit a more balanced assessment of interventions and would enhance evidence-based urological practice.
Keywords
Related Topics
Health Sciences
Medicine and Dentistry
Nephrology
Authors
Rodney H. Breau, Isabelle Gaboury, Charles D. Jr., Susan F. Fesperman, James D. Watterson, Philipp Dahm,