| Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3869020 | The Journal of Urology | 2011 | 6 Pages |
Abstract
Within the limitations of a relatively small number of patients and partial histopathological analysis, 11C-choline positron emission tomography/computerized tomography appears to have no advantage compared to 18F-FDG positron emission tomography/computerized tomography in the detection of metastatic bladder cancer. 18F-FDG positron emission tomography/computerized tomography has a tendency toward greater accuracy.
Keywords
ROIFluorodeoxyglucose F18SUVmax18F-FDGPPVTURBTpositive predictive valueemission-computedcomputerized tomographyPositron emission tomographypositron-emission tomographyTomographymaximum standardized uptake valueTransitional celltrue positiveFalse-positiveregion of interestFalse-negativePETCarcinomaCholine
Related Topics
Health Sciences
Medicine and Dentistry
Nephrology
Authors
Shay Golan, Vladimir Sopov, Jack Baniel, David Groshar,