| Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3869461 | The Journal of Urology | 2010 | 6 Pages |
Abstract
Results suggest that an increasing number of systematic reviews are published in the urological literature. However, many systematic reviews fail to meet established methodological standards, raising concerns about validity. Increased efforts are indicated to promote quality standards for performing systematic reviews among the authors and readership of the urological literature.
Keywords
Related Topics
Health Sciences
Medicine and Dentistry
Nephrology
Authors
Susan L. MacDonald, Steven E. Canfield, Susan F. Fesperman, Philipp Dahm,