Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
---|---|---|---|---|
3879474 | The Journal of Urology | 2006 | 11 Pages |
Abstract
Current evidence suggests that some form of monitoring would be a suitable treatment option in men with localized prostate cancer but there is little consensus over what markers should be used in such a program or how progression should be properly defined. The search for a method that safely identifies men with prostate cancer who could avoid radical intervention must continue.
Keywords
Related Topics
Health Sciences
Medicine and Dentistry
Nephrology
Authors
Richard M. Martin, David Gunnell, Freddie Hamdy, David Neal, Athene Lane, Jenny Donovan,