Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy in Clinical T1a and T1b Prostate Cancer: Oncologic and Functional Outcomes—A Matched-Pair Analysis

ObjectivesTo evaluate the effect of previous transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) on surgical, functional, and oncologic outcomes after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.MethodsFrom a series of 2100 patients undergoing laparoscopic radical prostatectomy, we compared the intraoperative complications and functional and oncologic outcomes for 55 patients who had been diagnosed with prostate carcinoma on previous TURP (group 1), with those of 55 matched patients who had not undergone previous prostate surgery (group 2). The patients were match-paired for age, operating surgeon, procedure type (eg, nerve-sparing, lymph node dissection), anastamotic technique, pathologic stage, and Gleason score. The minimal duration of follow-up was 24 months.ResultsBoth groups were similar with respect to patient age and pathologic stage. Of those with Stage cT1a and cT1b, 83.6% had a clinically significant tumor, with a mean tumor volume of 1.7 cm3 for those with Stage cT1a and 2.4 cm3 for those with Stage cT1b. The positive surgical margin rate was 14.5% and 16.3% for groups 1 and 2, respectively. Biochemical recurrence developed in 12.7% and 11% of patients in groups 1 and 2, respectively. Neither outcome was significantly different between the 2 groups. The long-term continence rates were similar; however, previous TURP was associated with a lower continence rate (49.1%) at 3 months compared with 61.8% for group 2 (P = .01). A nerve-sparing technique was used in 54% of group 1 patients. No significant difference was found in the potency rates between the 2 groups at 12 months.ConclusionsLaparoscopic radical prostatectomy after TURP is a challenging, but oncologically safe, procedure. The interval to total continence was delayed, but the potency rates remain unchanged.