Transvaginal Bone-Anchored Sling Procedure: 4 Years of Follow-Up on More than 200 Consecutive Patients

ObjectivesTo report intermediate-term results with reference to quality of life (QoL) and complications in 232 consecutive patients with stress urinary incontinence (SUI) treated with a transvaginal pubic bone-anchored sling (BAS).MethodsWe retrospectively reviewed 232 consecutive patients affected by SUI who underwent BAS using biologic and synthetic materials, with a mean follow-up of 50 months. Stress urinary incontinence was due to a defect of anatomic support and to intrinsic sphincteric deficiency in 220 patients and 12 patients, respectively. In all cases QoL was evaluated by Korman questionnaire.ResultsThe questionnaire outcomes of 232 patients were evaluated. One hundred seventy-three patients (74.5%) reported being cured, 21 patients (9.0%) were unchanged, and 38 patients (16.5%) failed. One hundred seventy-seven patients (76.2%) were satisfied with the BAS procedure, and 38 (16.3%) would perhaps still choose BAS implantation, whereas 17 patients (7.5%) would not repeat this choice again. Sixty patients (25.8%) reported pelvic pain that was occasional in 47 patients (20.2%) and recurrent in 13 patients (5.6%). Twenty-five patients (14.1%) reported dyspareunia that was occasional in 17 patients (10.7%) and recurrent in 8 patients (3.4%).ConclusionsThe BAS procedure shows an overall acceptable subjective cure rate, even if in the presence of a high percentage of complications. In this setting the BAS procedure cannot be proposed for correction of SUI.