Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
---|---|---|---|---|
3905310 | Urology | 2010 | 5 Pages |
ObjectivesTo determine whether postoperative bladder irrigation can be safely eliminated in the context of a modification to surgical technique. Post-operative irrigation is routinely used following suprapubic prostatectomy for benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH).MethodsSingle center retrospective study of 82 patients who underwent suprapubic prostatectomy for BPH comparing complications in those treated with irrigation to patients treated with surgical modification and no irrigation. These consecutive patients were divided into 2 groups: group 1 consisted of 43 patients who underwent suprapubic prostatectomy before June 2006 with post operative bladder irrigation and standard method of surgical hemostasis. Group 2 consisted of 39 patients who underwent suprapubic prostatectomy after June 2006 with no post operative irrigation and a modified bladder neck repair performed with the intent of improving hemostasis. The modified bladder neck repair is described.ResultsPatient characteristics and prostate specimen weights are comparable in both groups. Clot retention was more common in the group 1 patients (11 patients in group 1 vs 2 patients in group 2, P = .01), and 2 patients with disruption of the anterior bladder wall closure were in group 1.ConclusionsSuprapubic prostatectomy can be safely performed without the use of postoperative irrigation. The elimination of postoperative irrigation significantly reduces the economic burden on patients in our locality.