Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
---|---|---|---|---|
3916000 | Contraception | 2007 | 11 Pages |
There is a need for new, improved birth control methods which are easier to use, with less side effects and which avoid daily action, such as the pill. Perfect use requires consistent daily use or use at every act of intercourse. Long-acting methods eliminate the need for specific action at the time of coitus, or for daily action.Developing a new contraceptive is a major challenge. It is generally estimated that it takes 10–15 years to develop a new method and bring it to the market, at a cost of US$200–300 million, and the industry is reluctant to take the risk of such long-term investment. However, both risk and investment can be reduced by taking small steps. Slight improvements of existing contraceptives could result in a giant step forward.The development of frameless intrauterine systems (IUS) is an attempt to improve the performance and acceptability of intrauterine contraception. Both the frameless GyneFix® IUD and the frameless FibroPlant levonorgestrel (LNG)-IUS possess features which may solve the main problems encountered with conventional IUDs (e.g., expulsion, abnormal or excessive bleeding and pain). The performance of frameless devices, however, is dependent on correct anchoring of the device, which requires technical skill. Becoming a proficient GyneFix® or FibroPlant provider is easily acquired if the provider follows the procedural instruction strictly. For the less technically skilled provider, the Femilis™ LNG-IUS, using the new, simplified insertion technique, could be an excellent contraceptive option.It is usually not necessary to provide pain relief for insertion of an IUD/IUS, particularly in parous women. IUD providers should, however, realize that no woman likes to suffer from the insertion of an IUD. Severe discomfort may create a negative attitude towards the method. If the woman is anxious and fears pain (as most nulliparous women do), probably the most convenient, safe and effective method is to use local (intracervical) anesthesia using a dental syringe which can be applied with minimal risk in the office. In some women, the use of misoprostol 400 μg, 3 h prior to fitting of the IUD/IUS, may be useful to dilate the cervical canal. The popularity of the IUD could be much improved if attention is given to this aspect of IUD insertion.