| Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3944247 | Gynecologic Oncology | 2009 | 7 Pages |
ObjectiveEffective therapies with a low rate of side effects are warranted in the 2nd-line setting in ovarian cancer. Both topotecan and the alkylating agent treosulfan have demonstrated efficacy in this patient group and are broadly used in Germany. Therefore, we started a prospectively randomized phase III trial comparing these two drugs in early recurrent ovarian cancer.MethodsPatients having relapsed after platinum–taxane therapy were randomized to receive either topotecan or treosulfan. Stratification depended on platinum sensitivity (stratum 1: up to 6 months after primary chemotherapy, stratum 2: 6 to 12 months).ResultsA total of 274 patients were treated either with topotecan (136 patients) or treosulfan (138). Hematologic toxicity was significantly more frequent with topotecan but without severe clinical consequences. Non hematologic toxicity was similar in both study arms. Overall survival was significantly longer with topotecan (p = 0.0023), with a median of 55.0 weeks versus 41.0 weeks as well as progression-free survival (p = 0.0020) with a median of 23.1 weeks versus 12.7 weeks. Similar results were found for stratum 2 subgroup. Overall response rate was 27.5% for topotecan and 16.0% for treosulfan (p = 0.0307). In stratum 1 progression-free survival was 18.1 weeks for topotecan and 9.4 weeks for treosulfan (p = 0.0476), but there was no difference in overall survival in this prognostic poor subgroup.ConclusionsThis randomized phase III trial could detect superiority of topotecan versus treosulfan in patients with recurrent disease after platinum–paclitaxel combination therapy. Our experience indicates that optimization of systemic treatment could improve outcome even in this poor prognostic subgroup of patients with relapsed ovarian cancer.
